Saturday, December 28, 2024

Tariffs are self-defeating! Tariffs are not in the best interest of America's economy!

 

Here's AI's take on tariffs:

Lets hope higher intelligence prevails!

:

**"***

"Tariffs on imports are likely to depress the US economy rather than stimulate it. When tariffs are imposed, they act as a tax on foreign goods, raising their prices and making them less competitive in the US market. This can lead to higher prices for consumers, reduced demand for imported goods, and decreased economic activity.¹ ²


In fact, economists consider tariffs to be poor tools for boosting the economy, reducing the trade deficit, or achieving strategic objectives. They can benefit some domestic industries, but the negative effects on consumers, other businesses, and the broader economy often outweigh these benefits. Tariffs can also lead to retaliatory measures from other countries, sparking a trade war that can further harm the economy.


Historically, high tariffs have been associated with economic downturns, such as the Great Depression. The Smoot-Hawley Act of 1930, which significantly raised tariffs, is often cited as a contributing factor to the Depression. In contrast, periods of low tariffs and free trade have often coincided with economic growth and prosperity.


Additionally, tariffs can lead to a range of negative consequences, including:


- *Higher prices for consumers*: Tariffs increase the cost of imported goods, which can lead to higher prices for consumers and reduced demand.

- *Reduced economic activity*: Tariffs can decrease economic activity by reducing trade and investment.

- *Retaliation from other countries*: Tariffs can lead to retaliatory measures from other countries, sparking a trade war that can further harm the economy.

- *Damage to domestic industries*: Tariffs can actually harm domestic industries that rely on imported goods or components, such as manufacturers that use imported steel or aluminum.


Overall, while tariffs may provide some short-term benefits to certain domestic industries, the negative effects on the broader economy and consumers are likely to outweigh these benefits, leading to economic depression rather than stimulation."

***%*"""**"**

US trade imbalance with China:

"The US trade imbalance with China is a significant issue, with the US having a substantial trade deficit with China. In 2022, the US goods and services trade deficit with China was $367.4 billion, with US exports to China totaling $195.5 billion and imports from China reaching $562.9 billion.¹


Breaking it down further, the US goods trade deficit with China was $382.3 billion in 2022, while the services trade surplus was $14.9 billion. This means that while the US exports more services to China than it imports, the massive deficit in goods trade outweighs the services surplus.


Looking at the more recent data, in 2024, the US trade deficit with China has continued to grow, with the total trade deficit for the year already reaching $245.4 billion, with US exports to China totaling $118.2 billion and imports from China reaching $363.6 billion.²

The US trade deficit with China for 2024 is projected to be around $245.4 billion, based on the total trade deficit from January to December 2024. This is calculated from the total exports to China, which amount to $118.2 billion, and the total imports from China, which reach $363.6 billion.¹


It's worth noting that the US trade imbalance with China has been a longstanding issue, with the deficit growing over the years. In 2018, the trade deficit was $418.2 billion, and it has remained significant ever since."

*****" 

The cause of America's trade imbalance is America's rampant insatiable consumerism ,

Capitalism spawns a consumer culture driven by an ocean of advertizing aimed at promoting ever more consumption.

The only effective way to correct America's  trade imbalance is to reduce consumer demand ; i.e.to reduce consumption! But consumption (and immigration/population growth wch similarly increases consumer demand,) fuels/drives economic growth! 

Trumps intent to impose tariffs on imports and to restrict immigration will combine to depress the US economy!

 Hence Trumps policies may correct the trade I'mbalance,  but with the unintended consequence  of plunging  the economy into recession or even depression!!


***"""**

US imports from Canada, such as energy resources and manufactured goods, exceeded US exports to Canada by $80. billion in 2022.

Why would Trump expect Canada to import as much from the USA as it exports to the USA.?

Canada has 1/10 the population(consumers) of the US. It makes simple arithmetic logic that the US would import proportionally more consumer goods  from Canada than visa versa!               The import-export trade imbalance is simply proportional to and accountable in terms of  the population imbalance between the two countries!!

There is no disproportionate economic benefit to Canada in the Canada-,U.S. trade relationship!

It's mutually beneficial!

Monday, December 23, 2024

What's Water?!!

 




credit : Anonymous Namaste


In The Matrix, when Morpheus tells Neo that "many are not ready to unplug from the system," he is speaking to a profound truth about human nature and the nature of reality, which reflects both the story's fictional world and the real-life metaphysical condition of society. The "system" in The Matrix is a metaphor for the Illusion—an artificial construct designed to control and subdue humanity by giving them a false sense of reality, much like how many live today trapped in the illusions of society, unable or unwilling to see beyond the veil of lies, manipulation, and control.

Morpheus understands that, for many, the comfort of the system is preferable to the unsettling and often painful process of awakening to truth. People have become conditioned, through years—sometimes generations—of indoctrination, to accept the world as it is presented to them. To unplug from this system is to face a harsh, sometimes unbearable, reality that everything they thought was real is, in fact, a lie. This requires courage, a willingness to embrace discomfort, and most importantly, the readiness to let go of what one thought to be the truth.

Morpheus also knew that those still plugged into the system are often its most ardent defenders. Why? Because the system has become their identity. Their sense of self, their beliefs, their values—all are tied to the illusions and constructs of that system. To threaten it is to threaten everything they hold dear. For many, it is easier to defend the system (and to go on living their superficial lives)than to confront the possibility that they have been deceived.

Defending the System: A Psychological Reaction

When Morpheus says that "many will fight to protect it," he's speaking to a psychological truth: cognitive dissonance. When presented with information that contradicts deeply held beliefs, people experience discomfort. Instead of questioning the belief or the system itself, they will often reject the new information to protect their ego and sense of security. This is why people who are still plugged into the system will vehemently defend it, even when evidence suggests that it is corrupt, failing, or based on lies (false premises)

For those who are not ready to break free , the system represents safety, order, and familiarity. It's the comfortable prison of the mind, and to face the truth would mean losing not only this sense of safety but also their role within the system. The Illusion provides them with structure and predictability, and they will fight to preserve it, even at the cost of their freedom and truth.

Clinging to the Illusion in Today’s World

In today’s world, this concept is strikingly relevant. The system can represent various elements of modern society—political ideologies (e.g. populism)  , economic structures (e.g. capitalism), societal norms, and even religious dogma (e.g. sectarianism), Those who cling to the system often do so out of fear, ignorance, or a desire for control. The system, through media, education, and government institutions, programs people from an early age to accept it as reality. It offers a narrative: if you work hard, follow the rules, and accept your place within it, you will succeed, be happy, and fulfilled. But we know this is not true for everyone.

The awakening process requires breaking away from these narratives and questioning the very foundation of what is accepted as truth. This is the essence of Hermeticism—the practice of questioning the surface to find the deeper truths hidden beneath. However, those who cling to the system will often ridicule, attack, or ostracize anyone who dares question its authority. Why? Because to question it is to question the very fabric of their own reality.

Unplugging: A Difficult but Necessary Process

Unplugging from the system, much like in The Matrix, is a metaphor for waking up from the collective dream that has been sold to the masses. It's about peeling back the layers of illusion to see the world as it truly is, rather than how we’ve been told to see it. Yet, this process is not easy. It involves dismantling years of conditioning and societal programming. It means facing uncomfortable truths about the world and, more importantly, about ourselves.

For those ready to unplug, the journey is one of liberation—of freedom from the mental and spiritual bondage that the system imposes. But for many others, the fear of the unknown, the discomfort of confronting deep-seated beliefs, and the pain of letting go of long-held illusions are too overwhelming.

The Nature of the Matrix as a Metaphor for Control

In the context of Hermetics, the system represents more than just societal control—it represents the materialistic, limited, and external focus that keeps people trapped in ignorance of their true nature as divine consciousness.   The systems that shape our experience are invisible,,intractable...and taken for granted. The system fosters division, fear, and separation. It teaches people to focus on external validation, material success, and power over others. But in truth, as Hermetics teaches, we are all connected, and the real power lies in knowing and mastering the self.

To unplug from the system means to transcend these lower, ego-driven desires and awaken to the deeper spiritual truths that govern the universe. It’s about recognizing that the external world is but a reflection of the internal state. When we unplug, we reclaim our sovereignty and align ourselves with the higher principles of wisdom, truth, and love.

But those who cling to the system remain blind to this truth, often because the system rewards conformity and punishes deviation. They see anyone who unplugs as a threat, not because those individuals are dangerous, but because they challenge the false security the system provides.

Defending the Illusion: The Role of Fear

The strongest weapon of the system is fear—fear of the unknown, fear of losing status, fear of being wrong. This fear causes people to defend the illusion vehemently. They project this fear outward, attacking anyone who threatens to disrupt the illusion they’ve built their lives upon. This is why Morpheus says they will fight to protect it. They are not fighting for the system because they believe in it—they fight because they fear what lies beyond it. They fear the truth.

In Hermetic philosophy, fear is rooted in ignorance, and the antidote to fear is knowledge—gnosis, the direct personal experience of truth. When one begins to see beyond the Illusion, the fear starts to dissolve. The system’s control weakens because its power lies in keeping people in the dark, disconnected from their true essence. Those who cling to it do so not because the system serves them, but because they do not know who they are without it.

(They know no other truth/reality  other than the world view/belief system  that the system provides.Deprived of. the safety and familiarity of this world view  makes them feel like a fish out of water (without any solid ground to stand on)---as though their very life is threatrned.)


Moving Beyond the System

For those who have unplugged or are in the process of doing so, it is crucial to remember that not everyone is ready. Much like Neo, we must navigate the world with the awareness that many are still prisoners of their own minds, held captive by the Illusion. But the task is not to force anyone to awaken; rather, it is to continue living in truth, as beacons of light, planting seeds for those who are ready to see beyond the veil.

Morpheus’s words hold an eternal truth: many are not ready to unplug because they are not ready to face the chaos of the real world, where their perceptions, beliefs, and identities must be reexamined and. reconfigured .. And those who cling to the system(the false reality) will continue to defend it until they find the courage to look beyond it.


Sunday, December 8, 2024

No global agreement on ending plastic pollution

 Conte

Impasse over proposed, legally binding controls on toxic chemicals used to make plastics

Climate activists hold a banner as they march on a street.
Climate activists march on a street to demand stronger global commitments to curb plastic pollution on Nov. 23 in Busan, South Korea, two days before the start of what was supposed to be the fifth and final round of talks to develop an international, legally binding treaty to end plastic waste by 2040. (Minwoo Park/Reuters)

Negotiators working on a treaty to address the global crisis of plastic pollution for a week in South Korea won't reach an agreement and plan to resume the talks next year.

They are at an impasse over whether the treaty should reduce the total plastic on Earth and put global, legally binding controls on toxic chemicals used to make plastics.

The UN Intergovernmental Negotiating Committee meeting in Busan, South Korea, was supposed to be the fifth and final round of negotiations, to produce the first legally binding treaty on plastics pollution, including in the oceans, by the end of 2024. But with time running out early Monday, negotiators plan to resume the talks next year.

More than 100 countries want the treaty to limit production as well as tackle cleanup and recycling, and many have said that is essential to address chemicals of concern. But for some plastic-producing and oil and gas countries, that crosses a red line.

For any proposal to make it into the treaty, every nation must agree to it. Some countries sought to change the process so decisions could be made with a vote if consensus couldn't be reached and the process was paralyzed. India, Saudi Arabia, Iran, Kuwait and others opposed changing it, arguing consensus is vital to an inclusive, effective treaty.

On Sunday, the last scheduled day of talks, the treaty draft still had multiple options for several key sections. Some delegates and environmental organizations said it had become too watered-down, including negotiators from Africa who said they would rather leave Busan without a treaty than with a weak one.

Canadian Environment Minister Steven Guilbeault says he's disappointed that no agreement was reached on Sunday, but he added he is still hopeful a deal can be struck as negotiators make plans to meet again next year.

Guilbeault says he would plan to use next year's G7 summit set be hosted in Alberta as a platform to advance the issue.

Production expected to sharply increase

Every year, the world produces more than 360 million tonnes of new plastic. Plastic production could climb about 70 per cent by 2040 without policy changes.

Plastic production is on track to triple by 2050, and microplastics have been found in air, fresh produce and even human breast milk.

In animals such as fish, these broken-down bits of larger plastics have been linked to lower levels of growth and reproduction, among a host of other issues. Researchers are still trying to determine more conclusively whether microplastics carry a direct risk to human health, and at what level.

In Ghana, communities, bodies of water, drains and farmlands are choked with plastics, and dumping sites full of plastics are always on fire, said Sam Adu-Kumi, the country's lead negotiator.

"We want a treaty that will be able to solve it," he said in an interview. "Otherwise we will go without it and come and fight another time."

Two plastic pollution summit negotiators sit before microphones at a table.
Ghana's lead negotiator, Sam Adu-Kumi, speaks as Alejandra Parra, zero waste and plastics adviser for GAIA Latin America and the Caribbean, listens at a news conference in Busan on Sunday. (Anthony Wallace/AFP/Getty Images)

At Sunday night's meeting, Luis Vayas Valdivieso, the committee chair from Ecuador, said that while they made progress in Busan, their work is far from complete and they must be pragmatic. He said countries were the furthest apart on proposals about problematic plastics and chemicals of concern, plastic production and financing the treaty, as well as the treaty principles.

Valdivieso said the meeting should be suspended and resume at a later date. Many countries then reflected on what they must see in the treaty moving forward.

WATCH | Why it's so hard to end plastic pollution

Why it’s so hard to end plastic pollution

8 months ago
Duration7:07
Thousands of delegates are in Ottawa trying to hammer out an historic treaty to end plastic pollution, but the road to get there is littered with hurdles. CBC’s Susan Ormiston examines why it’s so hard to curb the problem and what it will take for the world to agree on a plan.

Rwanda's lead negotiator, Juliet Kabera, said she spoke on behalf of 85 countries in insisting that the treaty be ambitious throughout, fit for purpose and not built to fail, for the benefit of current and future generations. She asked everyone who supported the statement to "stand up for ambition." Country delegates and many in the audience stood, clapping.

Panama's delegation, which led an effort to include plastic production in the treaty, said they would return stronger, louder and more determined.

Saudi Arabia's negotiator said chemicals and plastic production are not within the scope of the treaty. Speaking on behalf of the Arab group, he said if the world addresses plastic pollution, there should be no problem producing plastic. Kuwait's negotiator echoed that, saying the objective is to end plastic pollution, not plastic itself, and stretching the mandate beyond its original intent erodes trust and goodwill.

In March 2022, 175 nations agreed to make the first legally binding treaty on plastics pollution, including in the oceans, by the end of 2024. The resolution states that nations will develop an international legally binding instrument on plastic pollution based on a comprehensive approach that addresses the full life cycle of plastic.

Stewart Harris, a spokesperson for the International Council of Chemical Associations, said it was an incredibly ambitious timeline. He said the ICCA is hopeful governments can reach an agreement with just a little more time.

Most of the negotiations in Busan took place behind closed doors. Environmental groups, Indigenous leaders and others who travelled to Busan to help shape the treaty said it should've been transparent and they felt silenced.

"The voices of the impacted communities, science and health leaders are silent in the process, and to a large degree, this is why the negotiation process is failing," said Bjorn Beeler, international co-ordinator for the International Pollutants Elimination Network. "Busan proved that the process is broken and just hobbling along."

South Korea's Foreign Affairs Minister Cho Tae-yul said that though they didn't get a treaty in Busan as many had hoped, their efforts brought the world closer to a unified solution to ending global plastic pollution.


Friday, December 6, 2024

AMNESTY GENOCIDE REPORT

 AMNESTY GENOCIDE REPORT

  Dec 5,2024

https://www.cbc.ca/listen/live-radio/1-2-as-it-happens/clip/16113879-there-ongoing-genocide-gaza-says-amnesty-international-secretary

Guest: Agnès Callamard


CH: Amnesty International says Israel is committing a genocide in Gaza. It's the first time in the human rights organization's 63-year history that it has made the charge during an active armed conflict. In its report, Amnesty says it looked at a nine-month period between October 7th, 2023, when Hamas attacked Israel, and early July, 2024. The report finds that Israel has sought to deliberately destroy Palestinians in Gaza, and that the Hamas attack on October 7th does not justify Israel's actions. Israel has called the report false and based on lies. The US State Department says it disagrees with Amnesty's conclusions, and Amnesty's own Israel branch disputes the allegation of genocide. Agnès Callamard is the Secretary General of Amnesty International. We reached her in the Hague.


NK: Agnès, as you know, there are specific requirements to meet the definition of genocide. There's already a case before the International Court of Justice looking at whether Israel's actions meet that definition. So why use this word in your report now?


AGNÈS CALLAMARD: We have investigated war crimes by Israel in Gaza for the last 14 months. It became very clear to us that those war crimes needed to be analyzed together in order to appreciate really the nature and the extent to what was going on in Gaza. In this context, to our investigation, it became increasingly clear that we needed to consider a very high threshold. And genocide became an evident threshold. As you pointed out, it's not just the act that matter in the crime of genocide. It is the genocidal intent.


NK: And what evidence did your Amnesty International team look at, Agnès, to come to this conclusion?


AC: Look, we have taken into account, of course, the military context and the military objectives. But the evidence that is being presented in our report clearly shows that the intention is not military, but the annihilation of the Palestinian people in part or in total in Gaza. Take, for example, the direct attacks on civilians repeated, repeated one day after another without any military necessity. We have shown the use of heavy explosive weapons with a wide radius of destruction in densely populated residential areas. That does not meet any kind of military objective. We have shown the repeated destruction of civilian infrastructures after Israel had gained military control over them. We have highlighted the act against that can only be intentional. For instance, the arbitrary detention, the use of torture. We have shown Israel’s very detailed bureaucratic control over humanitarian aid, which clearly shows that when they want, they can provide humanitarian aid to the people. And when they don't want to, they don't provide humanitarian aid to the people. The only, only conclusion is that it is aimed at the physical destruction of Palestinians in Gaza.


NK: Amnesty's Israel branch, which operates separately, says the scale of killing carried out by Israel in Gaza has reached, quote, horrific proportions and must be stopped immediately, unquote. But the group also says it does not accept your finding of genocide. A statement from employees obtained by the Haaretz newspaper says even before this investigation was complete, it was being referred to internally as the genocide report. Were your findings, Agnès, a foregone conclusion?


AC: First and foremost, we are talking here about some members of Amnesty International, Israel. They do not represent the section. And this will be handled through Amnesty International democratic processes. Our research has been undertaken for the last six months with the utmost integrity, painstakingly investigated. We've had dozens of researchers involved in this research, dozens of lawyers of the organization, and indeed, we have also relied on the external legal scholars who have reviewed our findings throughout the last six months. It was absolutely not a foregone conclusion.


NK: The Israel branch of amnesty has also said and questioned why you're not taking a look at what Hamas did. They said that there have been allegations of both the massacre carried out by Hamas on October 7th and the Israeli attack on Gaza following the massacre were genocide or attempted genocide, unquote. And they're saying that you need to apply this research universally and consistent for all parties. How do you respond to that?


AC: And we are. Absolutely. And we absolutely have done so. So we have already produced several briefing on the heinous crimes committed by Hamas on October 7th. And we have called for the last 14 months for the unconditional release of the hostage that we consider as a war crime. And we are involved in an in-depth investigation into October 7th, which will be produced in a couple of months, which will be meeting the exact same standards and resources that we have provided to this report on the genocide. Let me highlight the fact that October 7th was one day and it is finished. We are doing investigation on October 7th because we believe that all victims must be heard and we believe in justice. But there is an ongoing genocide against the Palestinian people and that must take precedence over anything else. There have been more than 40,000 Palestinians killed. There is no life left in Gaza. People have lost their dignity. They can't find food. They have to fight to get a piece of bread. That is the emergency. This is what we need to focus on. There is an ongoing genocide in Gaza, and the international community must do everything in their power to stop it.


NK: As our listeners heard in the introduction, Israel is rejecting the conclusions of your report. Israel's foreign ministry has said this is a fabricated report that is based on lies and called amnesty, quote, deplorable and fanatical, unquote, as an organization. They repeatedly say that they are going after Hamas. The US has responded as well to this, saying they believe the allegation of genocide that you've come to is unfounded. So realistically, Agnès, what impact do you think this report can have?


AC: We are not the first time, the first to declare and determine genocide. UN expert have determined that genocide is happening. Amnesty is adding its voice and as added 300 pages of evidence, which with all due respect, I doubt very much the Israeli authorities have considered. We have written to them repeatedly with our evidence, and they have never, not once over the last 14 months, responded and interacted with our findings. Genocide is not a matter of belief. What will happen, we are adding our voice. We are demanding that the International Criminal Court considers adding that crime to their arrest warrants. We are calling on governments around the world to do everything in their power to stop the genocide and certainly to stop the weapons, or else to face the risk of complicity in the crime of genocide.


NK: Agnès, I appreciate your time. Thank you for this.


AC: Thank you very much.


CH: Agnès Callamard is the secretary general of Amnesty International. She's in The Hague.

"No Other Land" is a portrait of a West Bank community on the brink of demolition.

 

cbcradio/thecurrent.  Dec. 5,2024


BASEL ADRA: We wanted to show the truth and the status quo that we are living in under this brutal occupation that doesn't hesitate [Music: Theme fading in] to approach us from our homeland by using the machines and using the money from the US, from Canada, from other countries. And we wanted to put this evidence in front of their eyes.

MG: The award-winning documentary, No Other Land, is a portrait of a West Bank community on the brink of demolition. For decades, the people who live there have been forced from their homes to make way for an Israeli military firing range. In 90 seconds, we'll be joined by two of this film's directors, the Palestinian Basel Adra and the Israeli Yuval Abraham, to talk about the making of this film, and how the past 15 months has changed their work and their friendship. I'm Matt Galloway. You're listening to The Current. We're back in just a minute. Stay with us.

[Music: Theme]

And a community displaced in the West Bank

Guests: Basel Adra, Yuval Abraham

MG: Hello again. I'm Matt Galloway and you're listening to The Current. Since 1981, the community of Masafer Yatta in the occupied West Bank has been under an evacuation and demolition order. The Israeli military designated the area as a firing zone. The issue is that Palestinians live there. The documentary, No Other Land, is a portrait of this community's struggle to save their homes and land. The film has been getting rave reviews at film festivals around the world, including the Toronto International Film Festival. This week, it won Best Documentary Prize at the Gotham Awards. It also picked up the best documentary prize at the New York Film Critics Circle Awards. Yesterday, it was nominated for an Independent Spirit Award, and it's also being tipped for an Oscar nomination, despite the fact that you can't see this film in the United States or Canada. The team behind the film is half Palestinian, half Israeli. And two of the filmmakers join us now. Basel Adra is in the West Bank. Yuval Abraham is in Jerusalem. Hello to you both.

BASEL ADRA: Hello to you.

YUVAL ABRAHAM: Hello, hi.

MG: Basel, describe your community for us. What does it look like?

BASEL ADRA: So, we are like small villages are located in Masafer Yatta, 20 small villages in the southern occupied West Bank. Our land became under the Israeli occupation since 1967, since the Israeli military invaded the West Bank. And they improved this occupation by changing it from temporary military controlling or occupying to today to like colonise our land by building settlements and for building the settlements and military bases, Israel always looked for the how to legitimise this to their, to their own laws. Designating Masafer Yatta as a fighting zone or, like, part of it as a state land by the military law or part of the Israeli law is in order to steal our land.

MG: And the land is being the, the land is being used, the government says, for tank training. Is that right?

BASEL ADRA: So, this law, they designated 20 per cent of the West Bank as a, as a fighting zone and 14 out of 20 Masafer Yatta villages as a firing zone. But Yuval, who's just here, found in the state archives, Masafer Yatta first was designated as the fighting zone and earlier in the '80s. And they said this is for the military, military exercises, military trainings and very clear violating international law where occupying country or military can't remove the people, or can't even make military trainings in the occupied territories.

MG: People still live there, though, right? I mean, people are living [BASEL ADRA: Yeah, yeah.] in caves now in the, in that area.

BASEL ADRA: People live in caves and tents and in houses, and they face a lot of demolitions where you see this story in no other land.

MG: Yuval, you're Israeli. Why did you want to get involved in what's happening in Masafer Yatta?

YUVAL ABRAHAM: Well, first of all, I think that for me, growing up, I didn't know about this reality of the occupation. And when you see it, it becomes very hard to justify it. And I came and I met Basel and I saw these house demolitions that he's speaking about, how you have any farmers, people living in their villages and anything they do, the military destroys their, their existence there is declared illegal, right? By a system of laws that they cannot influence. They cannot vote. Imagine you cannot vote, and some foreign military tells you that your school and your water well and your existence is illegal because they decided so. And it seemed to me like such a huge atrocity, which I feel responsible for as an Israeli. So, that's the first reason. And the second reason is that I think that as long as the Palestinian people are not free, my people, the Israeli people will not be safe and will never be at all. You cannot control millions of people, place them under a system where they are constantly dominated by military where they keep on losing their lands and being pushed out of their lands, year after year after year, for decades and just continue as normal. And unfortunately, you know, and I'm saying this is an Israeli, unfortunately, states all over the world, including Canada, by the way, have done nothing to change this. I don't think Canada has even recognised Palestine as a state, which would be the most basic step possible. So for me, I think it's clear that this is extremely unjust and nobody would accept it. None of our listeners would accept being controlled by a foreign army, and it has to change. And today, it's, it's more urgent than ever. And we need a political solution and we need leaders to step up to the moment.

MG: When you arrived in the community, somebody, people are shocked you're a journalist. You were there to tell this story and somebody says to you, 'You're a human rights Israeli?' What did you make of that?

YUVAL ABRAHAM: There is a community of human rights organisations in Israel, which is a small community, but it exists. But today, unfortunately, and this, I can say on behalf of the Israeli human rights community, we are very weak and very small and change is not going to come from within right now. I mean, we are unable to stop the starvation of Gaza. We are unable to stop, what? Recently Moshe "Bogie" Ya'alon, a right-wing Israeli who was the head of the Israeli military in 2014, called the ethnic cleansing of Gaza, which is still ongoing. Hundreds of thousands of people are at risk of being killed. Of death, according to the UN, especially in the North and the West Bank, communities like [inaudible] are constantly being erased. The settlers became the soldiers, and they're being pushed out. And we, as the human rights community in Israel, are literally begging the world to place pressure on our country to not, you know, we are really begging the world not. First of all, we need sanctions and we need an arms embargo, and it cannot continue. You cannot continue when you see what is happening. It's not to our benefit as Israelis. And of course, it is not for the benefit of the Palestinian people who are being killed. We need, we need a radical change of foreign policy all over the world so we can move to a place where the Palestinians are free from occupation and foreign control and supremacy. And both the Israelis and the Palestinians can have rights and self-determination and statehood. And if there is no change, I mean, you know, I talked to many people in the human rights community in Israel, and it will not come from within. Not in the next few years. And it's very, very urgent.

MG: Basel, why did you want to document what was happening in your community? You say in the film, 'You started filming when we started to end.' Why did you want to document this?

BASEL ADRA: It's very important to film and to have the evidence. We, as Palestinians see how the world behaves with us. We see how the leaders in the Western world keep calling us the only democracy in the Middle East. And Israel keeps also using its propaganda and exploiting itself and its system as that only democracy in the Middle East. But we wanted to show the truth And the status quo that we are living in under this brutal occupation that doesn't hesitate or doesn't like losing any moment to uproot us from our homeland by using the machines and using the money from the U.S., from Canada, from other countries to, for the weapons, for the settlements, for the colonising project. So, I brought us from our homeland and we wanted to put this evidence in front of their eyes and show them that the apartheid that they are trying to deny is not true. The apartheid exists and we want it. We wanted this to change. This is the goal. Beyond that, we wanted to be able to know what's going on to us. And this is can't continue like that. It should change.

MG: Yuval, how do you describe what the average Israeli citizen understands about what's happened to people like Basel in communities like this? Because the film shows homes being bulldozed. There are also members of the community who are beaten by, by settler groups, by Israeli forces. A man is shot point blank and left paralysed after he tries to stop his home from being bulldozed. How would you describe how people in Israel understand what's happening in a community like this?

YUVAL ABRAHAM: Again, I don't want to generalise, but the majority of people in Israel, of the Jewish Israelis, because the Israeli society has Palestinians as well who I think would understand more. But I think the majority of Jewish Israelis don't, don't understand. They don't understand because for two reasons they think. First of all, when you are tasked with enforcing a military occupation, you know, military service is mandatory in Israel. And people for decades have been tasked with enforcing, you know, men and women and enforcing this regime of control. You justify it in your own mind when you are committing. It's very hard to, to, you know, to, to look at an individual through the barrel of a gun for, for decades and not to justify it for yourself. And that's, I think, one justification that, that will happen. And the second thing, we don't, I mean, we don't see. We don't, nobody I mean, the media does not report about it. The mainstream media is not shown the Israeli society an image coming out of Gaza. That is not the images, it's the military films from the drones and from, from the military spokesperson's unit. So, there is, there is a very big bubble. And that empowers, obviously, the Israeli right, which is able to frame everything as this, you know, total security issue with no, never. There is never any context. There is never any talk today about a political solution, about how maybe we can recalibrate the relations between Israelis and Palestinians not to be based on controlling an occupation, but on some form of equality between the two people. That is, that is, that is today gone. I mean, that is a discourse that maybe existed in the Israeli society in the '90s, I think largely due to Netanyahu's policies. But, but not only him. Any talk of, any talk of the occupation is now is, it does not happen.

[cross-talk]

MG: You go, you go on Israeli television programs and you're attacked saying that the people say that you are against Jewish people for, for what you're reporting.

YUVAL ABRAHAM: Yeah. I mean, first of all, I used to be invited to some Israeli TV channels since October 7th. You know, the space for that is narrowed even further. So, so, I'm, I'm less invited today, but I do get attacked by some Israelis who claim that I'm against Israelis or against Jewish people. Again, I think that the two people are connected. And I think that the security of my people is, is fundamentally rooted in the security of the Palestinian people. And the idea that, you know, you can kill 17,000 children and somehow do that in the name of security is not only false, it's also completely illogical and wrong and atrocious. And I think realising that for me is it is, it's maybe, maybe it sounds basic to some people, but, but really, this is this is a fundamental realisation. Like, we are connected to one another and what we do to the other side echoes back to us. And, and I just don't think it's sustainable to continue in the way that what we are doing.

MG: Basel, what do you what do you want Israelis to understand about your community?

BASEL ADRA: To be honest, I don't think Israelis understand what they are doing to us. I hope that they will, they will stop what they are doing to us. And they stop supporting their military like, by committing this to us. I think most of the Israelis understand what's going on in Gaza and the West Bank, and they should not, they should not support it. They should, they should reject it.

MG: The filming for, for this documentary wrapped up right before the atrocities on the 7th of October of last year. How do you think, Basel, that impacts the ability of this film to be seen by audiences? It doesn't have a distributor. It's won awards. Was, you know, well-received at the Film Festival in Toronto, just won a big award in New York, and yet it does not have a distributor. How do you think what happened on the 7th of October has shaped the reception to it?

BASEL ADRA: Well, it's said that the movie didn't have a distributor in the U.S. because the movie have been received well at festivals and this week we won like the Gotham Awards and, you know, Berlinale and [inaudible], important awards, also other many awards from other festivals. And the movie found the distributors and it was a challenge to find also in Germany. But in the end of the day, we found some ones. But it's sad that in the U.S. still nobody is like, people need to, to be brave because the movie is, our work between me and Yuval and others, people like us and our circuit really work and begging the world to change what's going on, and the only change can come from outside, from the US and from that, from Europe and from Canada that they should take a position. And we worked all this years. We really wanted to achieve a change before arriving at the days like October 7th, sadly, that we are right in that moment, and since one, since, since 14 months, like witnessing a genocide, it doesn't stop.

MG: Yuval, how do you think the past year... You talked about, you know, what happens when you go or used to go on Israeli television, and now you can't do that in your own country. How do you think what happened over the past year: 1,200 Israelis killed, hostages still held in Gaza. How has that changed how Israelis think about Palestinians and, and whether they are, they're receptive at all to the ideas that are presented in a film like this?

YUVAL ABRAHAM: So, look, generally speaking, when historically, when faced with atrocities committed against Israeli civilians like October 7th, like the hostages that need to be released, the society moves to the right and entrenches even further the military occupation and apartheid and commits atrocities against Palestinians, which then causes the Palestinian society to move further to the right. I mean, I mean, you spoke rightfully about the atrocities of October 7th. And, you know, and you mentioned the killed Israeli children and civilians. But I wonder, I mean, would you feel as free to use this word when referring to Gaza, where 400 times as many children were killed and if the unjustifiable killing of so many Israeli civilians pushed the Israeli society so much to the right, then what is the killing of tens of thousands and maybe hundreds of thousands of Palestinian civilians that has been going on for months and months doing to the Palestinian society? I ask myself. So, I think that our film is important because it looks for a way out of this. It, Basel spoke to this just now. I mean, I mean, we don't want to see civilians being killed and slaughtered. And the way to prevent that. The way to stabilise the relations between Israelis and Palestinians has to be a political solution. And I ask myself again, I'm sorry to bring this up again, because this is not something new. Like, why did we have to reach to this point to have the world talking about it and why still, Canada and United States have not recognised even Palestine as a state? I mean, the kind of political solutions that we are talking about is one that is based on, of the, the Palestinians deserve to be free and that the Palestinians and the Israelis can both have their rights and statehood and what they need. But when you are preventing that, and this is maybe the most important point: When you have blocked every single path for Palestinian freedom of occupation, which is what any person would want, when you blocked the legal path, when the U.S. vetoes the UN Security Council, when the Palestinian human rights organisations are declared terrorist organisations, when you cannot protest in the West Bank because any protest is illegal, and when Canada does not recognise Palestine as a state, when you block every single path, the likelihood of atrocities and violence, which is never justified, becomes much, much higher. So people like us on the left are really, again, asking the world to change their foreign policy so there can be a political solution.

MG: How do you understand, and this picks up on that, how do you understand the reaction and the reception to the film? I asked Basel about the lack of a distribution. The film has been shown at film festivals. When it was shown at the Berlin Film Festival, it won the best documentary prize. The German Minister of Culture said she was only clapping for you, not for Basel, and that there were accusations of anti-Semitism levelled against the film and its supporters. You said to stand on German soil as the son of Holocaust survivors and call for a ceasefire, then to be labelled as anti-Semitic is not only outrageous, it's also literally putting Jewish lives in danger. How do you understand as, as an Israeli, how do you understand the reception to the film?

YUVAL ABRAHAM: Yeah. I mean, I think for me, you know, being, being in Berlin and me and Basel both spoke about basically very similar way that we are speaking now in this interview. And the word anti-Semitism for me carries a lot of weight. It carries a lot of weight because my family, as you said, was, was killed, much of it in the Holocaust. And also because anti-Semitism is rising today on the right and on the left. And it's a very real phenomenon that I care about. And when it's used to silence people who are criticising Israel or criticising the occupation or just to block our film like, like as, as what has happened in Germany, it's not only outrageous because it, it's a tool to silence Palestinians and, and Israelis apparently who are critical of what the state of Israel is doing. But it also empties the word out of meaning, because if you label everything as anti-Semitism all the time, then nothing is anti-Semitism, then the word just completely loses its meaning. And I think that's, it's not a coincidence that this is happening in Germany. And I think Germany completely misunderstands its responsibility towards Jewish people and the Israelis. I mean, it equates support for Israelis or for Jewish people with supporting what the Israeli government and the Israeli state has been doing, which is a prolonged, prolonged occupation and apartheid. And I think it's the complete opposite. If you care about Jewish people, if you care about Israelis, if you care about international law, you have to respect it. And once the international law organs are telling us, what the ICJ told us is that the occupation is illegal. And what the ICC told us, the International Criminal Court is that Israeli leaders have committed the crimes against humanity and war crimes alongside Hamas leaders, and they need to be arrested. And the fact that Israel is now waging a war against the organs of international law with the sometimes passive and sometimes active support of Germany and, of course, the United States and, and I guess, also Canada, should terrify us because international law is important. And the organs of international law were created as a result of the horrific atrocities committed because of anti-Semitism in the Second World War.

MG: Just the last point on this. I mean, you faced death threats because of this. This comes up in the film where somebody says to you, 'You're on Facebook. Somebody will come and pay you a visit,' but you face death threats for, for what you've said and your involvement in this film, right?

YUVAL ABRAHAM: Yeah. I mean, I face, me and my family. My mom had to leave the house for a while in February. I think it shows you the position, you know, the amount of space for criticism today in the Israeli society, which it is significantly narrowed after October 7th. But again, I have to say, I am today not in physical danger. Like, I think, thinking of, I'm talking to you now from Jerusalem. Basel is in Masafer Yatta in the West Bank. I am able to travel. I can go to my house. I don't have to sleep every night with my shoes on because I'm afraid that the military will invade and I will have to run. And this is how Basel has to live. So, so again, I understand. I have, I have a lot of privilege also as a Jewish-Israeli. And, and I don't feel I am, I am now a victim of this. Like, I will continue to get together with Basel, together with other Palestinians and Israelis. We see a different kind of future based on international law and justice and equality. We will continue this, this struggle.

MG: Basel, at one point in the film, you tell Yuval to get used to failing, that he shouldn't expect to solve what's happening to your community in a few days' time. How do you think about the scope of time when it comes to your fight in your community?

BASEL ADRA: I think the same. I certainly like, and especially with Trump being elected today, we are in very like, the future is a bit clear. There's going to be more nightmare than what we are living in today, especially the people whose pointing and putting in positions, saying there is no such thing called the West Bank. And this is not the settlements, it is Jewish neighbourhoods in here. So, this is like completely like supporting to ethnic cleansing us from our homes and to, to build and to expand the settlements and the outposts. We wish we could speak about optimistic and positively about what's going on. But as you, as you can see in the news, we are just living in very, very harsh days. I don't know, I know what we can hope for our future and on what we can, what really exactly what happened.

MG: How do you see your friendship? You're collaborators, but you're also friends, Basel. And I just wonder and this is a big part of the film: A Palestinian and an Israeli working together and that they become friends and collaborators. How do you, how do you see how the last year has impacted your own friendship?

BASEL ADRA: From the beginning, I think we were very clear and we see each other as a human beings and as equal human beings, and we should live in equal, equal situation and nobody controls the other, the other, the other people. I mean, this is not unique, but unfortunately, the people like us, our other friends in this circuit, we are powerless. The problem is we are begging the people with power to do their, their own job and their own action to stop this because we are powerless. We don't have power to change this. And we wish we could have the power to change what's going on and to end all this violence and to live equal in this land. This is friendship, and this relationship between Israeli and Palestinian can't give the people outside false hope. The people have responsibility. This is their money, and their countries that empowering Netanyahu and these governments and this is should not go, goes on. This is should stop. The occupation should end and a political solution should be achieved, and only when this governments start to take positions and actions in order to achieve this political change.

MG: Yuval, what about for you? How do you see your friendship with Basel after, after this last year?

YUVAL ABRAHAM: Well, I have to say, I, I agree with every word Basel said. And not only because we are friends, because I think it's very wise politically. And he recognises some of the fundamental roots of the violence. And I think our understanding, our shared values held us together and are holding us together. And I feel now even more strongly. It's not, it's not as if because an Israeli was murdered or because a Palestinian was murdered that I am suddenly going to be angry is best said. On the contrary, like we knew, we were warning against this. The entire human rights community in Palestine and in Israel was warning that if we don't end the occupation, if there is no political solution, then, then we will reach where we are reaching. And again, it's not to justify any kind of violence. And every person has agency and over their actions. But we were warning exactly against this. And it just makes me more really heartbreaking. Like, I cried so much over this past year, losing people, friends to both, both Israelis and Palestinians and people that I knew. And, and I'm really angry that that we had to reach this point and that the world is still not taking the, the action that is needed to take to, to begin changing, the change that we need.

MG: What do you hope a film like this, and the work that you have done with Yuval, what's that message that it could send to other people about, about recalibrating that relationship and finding some, some degree of peace and justice, do you think?

BASEL ADRA: I hope, I hope at least we will, we will succeed and manage to, to change individuals around the world in Canada and the U.S. and Europe, individuals would see the truth of what's going on and they will join our, our struggle and solidarity, I mean, to protest, to stress on their governments, to do the right thing. I hope people would understand and not just after understanding what would take action, because this movie is kind of a call to action for, for the people, for the audience who would see it, for not to remain silent because not just, again, not the commentary that showing something in the past, but showing a reality that's going on.

MG: Yuval, what about for you? You say in the film it would be nice to have stability and then Basel could come and visit you. Do you think that is going to happen? Do you think that relationship will be recalibrated?

YUVAL ABRAHAM: I don't know. Now, I'm very much afraid. You know, I think we're in a situation of urgency in, where hundreds of thousands of people are going to perhaps die in Gaza. I mean, that's what's at stake right now. So, these visions that we had about recalibrating and about, you know, whatever you want to call it, a two-state solution, a confederation, the position where the occupation ends and there is some kind of equality. I mean, that's further and further away. Right now, we're speaking about people who are being starved to death and are not receiving food and water. And every day, we have another 100 people killed. Right now, it's, it's about survival. It's not even about, you know, having a political solution that's so much further away. Like, I think we should all be focussed on that right now. That is, that is the most urgent thing.

MG: It's a very powerful film. I'm glad to talk to you both about it. Thank you very much.

YUVAL ABRAHAM: Thank you.


,**********_**




Friday, November 22, 2024

Friday, November 8, 2024

America has gone mad!!

 









America has gone mad!!


Yesterday's day of decision revealed the true soul of America!
Americans have chosen a bigot,racist,mmisogynist,zenophobe, fascist, a nd convicted felon to be their leader. Trump has. no moral scruples or constraints.
He is motivated only by self-interest and the mighty doller.
Giving such a person . all the state's levers of power will be globaly catastrophic , ...not only to America but to the whole of humanity!
Trump's policies/agenda will move America toward autocracy!
A Trump administration will be reflective of his vulgar and incendiary comments and his .outragous personal behaviour.(his policies will endorse racism, misogyny, rightwing extremism)
Under Trump's leadership the world will move backwards!



 

***""********




 

Glad to hear you are hopeful for the future under Donald Trump's leadership.
I am not so hopeful. Trump's character and his past behaviour make me worried  and very apprehensive!
As someone who believes in Christian values you must be aware that Donald Trump is not an exemplar of these values (neither in speech nor actions)
In most societies held together by moral values and rules of law a twice impeached convicted felon would not be qualified to vote let alone run for public office . It would be madness to give such a person a leadership role! Yet this is now our reality in America
You have chosen to be led by someone who in his obsessive pursuit of money and power has lostt his moral compass and forsaken his humanity!

 

These are indeed dark times!

***********
I am afraid that using tariffs to force jobs and manufacturing g back to aAmerica may backfire!
The Reason corporations outsource their production to china,india,etc is because productivity is higher in these countries and the cost of labour is lowerr
For exampple, if IPhone were made in USA ,it would probably cost $3000.instead of $1500!
Taxing imports means that the consumer will. have to. Pay. more for imported consumer produuucts.
This will reduce consumer sppendiing/demand and slow the ecoono mom y!
Higher prices on all consumer goods wil II plunge the economy into an inflationary. recessio n!